Prediction of Yannick Hanfmann [121st] vs Daniel Cukierman [809th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L L L L
Form
L L L W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Hanfmann 1 - 0 Cukierman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hanfmann winning 2 and Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Hanfmann and Cukierman was at the Davis Cup, World Group, Q, ISR-GER 1-3, 31-01-2025, Rubber 2, I.hard with Yannick Hanfmann getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | 1 |
| Daniel Cukierman | 0 |
| Hanfmann | Stats | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (6-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 30% (3-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 121 | Ranking | 809 |
| 45 | Highest Rank | 339 |
| 33 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 3 |
| 58% (359-265) | Career Total W/L | 57% (256-195) |
| $1,683,545 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yannick Hanfmann vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hanfmann 1 - 0 Cukierman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hanfmann has won 45.75% of points on their second serve, while Cukierman has won 41.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hanfmann, in recent form, has won 46.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cukierman has won 48.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.26% and 29.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hanfmann has saved 55.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cukierman has saved 51.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hanfmann has won 43.14% of matches played (W/L 22/ 29), with Cukierman winning 39.29% (W/L 11/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hanfmann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 212/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/ 19). Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 50/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hanfmann has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.48% of matches (W/L 16/ 17), where as Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 9/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hanfmann winning 1 times and Cukierman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hanfmann winning 2 and Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Hanfmann and Cukierman was at the Davis Cup, World Group, Q, ISR-GER 1-3, 31-01-2025, Rubber 2, I.hard with Yannick Hanfmann getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hanfmann and Cukierman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hanfmann winning 0 times and Cukierman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hanfmann winning 0, and Cukierman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hanfmann has played against opponents with an average rank of 138.61 while Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 351.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hanfmann has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cukierman has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hanfmann has converted 32.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cukierman has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Yannick Hanfmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
David Goffin
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
63 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
87 of
138)
9
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
60 of
138)
133
Total Points Won
121
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Manuel Guinard
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Cukierman
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Valentin Vacherot
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Daniel Cukierman
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Cukierman
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
16
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Hanfmann vs Cukierman?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Hanfmann Vs Cukierman is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (359/265) | Win/Loss | 57% (256/195) |
| 55% (812/660) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (573/446) |
| 52% (7366/6682) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4850/4297) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2551 | Aces Total | 723 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1224 | Total Double Faults | 1041 |
| 1:24:16 | Average Match Time | 1:11:31 |
| 404.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.74 |
| 64% (24185/37867) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13614/21555) |
| 70% (16929/24185) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (8977/13614) |
| 52% (7172/13682) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3854/7941) |
| 40% (1508/3781) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1144/2426) |
| 39% (15409/39602) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9382/21745) |
| 59% (351/598) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (252/442) |
| 16% (3/19) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 44% (89/202) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (43/90) |
| 56% (114/203) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (61/124) |
| 84% (359/302) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (254/223) |
| 16% (359/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (254/30) |
| 21% (265/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (196/32) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yannick Hanfmann
View full predicted draw for Hanfmann in Munich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
